I find Iggy Pop’s work to be compelling because he is a rebel, punk and an artistic icon. He was that somewhat mainstream because he emerged from the underground music scene, and remained loyal to it. He refuses to play at stadiums, arguing that it’s not a setting for his art. He still plays shows, and I believe Iggy is one of those seldom mentioned idols who pushed art punk or avant punk into popular consciousness. I saw him perform at the Orpheum theatre. He still closely interacts with the audience, like he is in a small venue. Below is one of my favorite Iggy interviews. The utter honesty of his answers, and his humble and candid credo, are the reasons why. Within he conveys ideas about the art of the event, and living it, in his performance:
I can relate to Iggy’s thinking. He is an artsy performer who embraced ancient theatrical concepts. He is spontaneous and chaotic. Iggy Pop popularized underground new wave music. His sound reached me in the Middle-East, and he didn’t sound conventional. I liked his lyrics too, influenced by the blues that I listened to. He got to express himself, and be violent about, with no preservation. He has fun expressing himself while performing, he isn’t focusing on the performance he already know, he is expressing it truthfully. The Dionysian element in his performance was liberating to watch on rare videos. I was influenced by his performance. I learned that performing poetry, and music doesn’t have to be structured, and we are free to be impulsive. In the real world, our impulsivity is frowned upon. Yet with artists, spontaneity is praised. He is very emotional, or was as he seems more stable now. He didn’t mind displaying disruptive behavior. He was disturbed and got to express it as an artist. He conveyed his disturbance openly, and it was applauded. He’s an extremely talented and witty songwriter. He assisted other artists in avoiding the boredom of the cliches, and the stereotypical “rock stars” in mainstream media.